Linked by David Adams on Tue 29th Jan 2008 23:10 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes Loyal OSNews readers, I 'd like to thank you for your patience as we've made a bumpy transition to a new back-end and an even bumpier rollout of the OSNews' new design, aka OSNews 4.1. We hope you like it. We'll be making many minor interface changes over the next weeks, and we'll read the comments of this posting in case you have any bug reports or suggestions. One feature that we've eliminated from the v4 beta was themes. For now, we are focusing on perfecting one unified theme, and hope to revisit that feature in the future. I'd like to thank OSNews' intrepid code slinger Adam Scheinberg for all his hard work on this project and also thank the many readers who helped us troubleshoot the v4 backend.
Order by: Score:
Looks awesome!!
by DittoBox on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:32 UTC
DittoBox
Member since:
2005-07-08

You guys did a great job!

RE: Looks awesome!!
by vimh on Wed 30th Jan 2008 19:45 UTC in reply to "Looks awesome!!"
vimh Member since:
2006-02-04

I like the new look. White space is a bit distracting on large screens but I tend to keep my browser window smallish so that doesn't tend to be too bad.

less ugly
by mikesum32 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:32 UTC
mikesum32
Member since:
2005-10-22

Well the logo is still ugly, but better, and the bubble things at the top (like KDE has) are ugly too, IMHO. It is nicer to look at though. I like the gray.

*Edit*

Bring back themes please. :-)

Edited 2008-01-30 00:33 UTC

hugs
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:34 UTC
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

/me hugs the new design. I love it!

One thing though... Why was it code-named brittny...? ;)

RE: hugs
by David on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:40 UTC in reply to "hugs"
David Member since:
2005-06-29

Name of one of the designers that worked on it. It wasn't a code name, but rather a workspace we made for her.

Great job!
by Crono on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:36 UTC
Crono
Member since:
2006-11-08

But I don't like it.
How do I get the old design back? There's no option in the preferences...

Edited 2008-01-30 00:37 UTC

RE: Great job!
by flanque on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:37 UTC in reply to "Great job!"
flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

I agree. I think it looks horrible. I really dislike this design change.

RE[2]: Great job!
by DittoBox on Wed 30th Jan 2008 16:27 UTC in reply to "RE: Great job!"
DittoBox Member since:
2005-07-08

Are you going to say its ugly, or are you going to provide some constructive criticism?

RE[3]: Great job!
by flanque on Wed 30th Jan 2008 18:38 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Great job!"
flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

This site's comment system isn't about constructive criticism. Having said that, there's an implication that my 'constructive criticism' is to have the old design back.

RE[4]: Great job!
by tyrione on Wed 30th Jan 2008 21:43 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Great job!"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

This site's comment system isn't about constructive criticism. Having said that, there's an implication that my 'constructive criticism' is to have the old design back.


Actually, your comment just expresses a dislike for this design change. It doesn't compare or contrast what you liked or disliked about the prior design and whether you even liked the prior design.

In short, it wasn't a constructive criticism. It was just a short rant.

Replies to a particular post?
by wannabe geek on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:39 UTC
wannabe geek
Member since:
2006-09-27

The new look is nice .. not that there was anything wrong with the old look though. ;)

I miss the feature of looking at message and having all replies to it available.

RE: Replies to a particular post?
by Adam S on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:44 UTC in reply to "Replies to a particular post?"
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

That's back as of today too. Click on the title of any post.

MamiyaOtaru Member since:
2005-11-11

That's nice of course, but I still miss being able to see at a glance whether any posts (particularly egregiously false ones) already have any replies. Then coming back later whether there are any more.

The current way has all the functionality of course, just that one has to click something now, then press back when done in order to check another post. Basically it would be nice to see the number of replies a post has before clicking on the title.

First impression
by Luminair on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:40 UTC
Luminair
Member since:
2007-03-30

Too much contrast between the large white background area and everything else. Kills the eyeballs.

Meanwhile the story blocks are undifferentiated from each other, and the x comments text contrasts too little with the white background.

Gray header, white background, puke green side headers, and orange user header at the top. Strange and incongruent color choices to say the least.

(Already fixed) Black text on dark gray comment headers in the comment section -> little contrast between the two. The black text on dark gray comment header is not consistent with the main site header where it is white / light gray text on dark gray background.

Self-comments have drastically different header text color than other comments, which weirds me out a bit.

No search button by the search dialog on the front page; it is a worthwhile convention and there is ample room for it.

The My Account button has mouseover dead space at the top and bottom of it. This is inconsistent with the menu it provides, in which all implied button area provides clickable action.

Edited 2008-01-30 00:51 UTC

Better
by sbergman27 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:42 UTC
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

I definitely prefer this to the original version 4 look. But I still prefer version 3 to this. I think that I *could* get to like this as well or better. But the main thing bothering me is that it still looks so *bright*. All that white background is harder on the eyes.

RE: Better
by David on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:43 UTC in reply to "Better"
David Member since:
2005-06-29

I think a slightly gray background (similar to the old site but maybe a bit lighter) will be coming back

RE[2]: Better
by BiPolar on Wed 30th Jan 2008 12:04 UTC in reply to "RE: Better"
BiPolar Member since:
2007-07-06

Yes, please... Try to be nice on everybody's eyes and change the white background to some light-mid-gray (and make sure that comment's font color is black).

Well done.
by brewin on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:46 UTC
brewin
Member since:
2005-06-30

Well done. One thing I'm not particularly fond of is the Featured box. I see from the Conversations that I'm not alone. With the Recent Original Stories on the right, I don't think the big box is needed.

Also, the logo is fine, but it might be fun to have a contest to see what people can come up with.

RE: Well done.
by Adam S on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:57 UTC in reply to "Well done."
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

My Account > Preferences > Hide Featured Box

RE[2]: Well done.
by BTrey on Wed 30th Jan 2008 14:03 UTC in reply to "RE: Well done."
BTrey Member since:
2006-03-27

Does not work, at least for my account. I select "Hide Feature Box", click "Save Preferences" and the preference page reloads - with the Feature Box option helpfully reset to "Show Feature Box."

RE[3]: Well done.
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2008 14:07 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Well done."
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Mmm, I just tested it and it works fine for me. I'm sure Adam'll look into it today.

The green background
by RandomGuy on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:46 UTC
RandomGuy
Member since:
2006-07-30

The green background of the headlines on the right side looks a little off with the rest of the page using greyish colors...

That's my quick first impression.
Otherwise I like it.

On comment responses ...
by WorknMan on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:49 UTC
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

With the old design, I used to be able to look at someone's comment and see if anyone has replied to it. Does this feature not exist in the new design, or am I just blind ? ;)

EDIT: It's nice that you can click on the link title of a comment and read the replies, but is there no longer a way to tell at a glance whether there are any replies to a particular comment, as there used to be?

Edited 2008-01-30 00:51 UTC

RE: On comment responses ...
by Adam S on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:53 UTC in reply to "On comment responses ..."
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

With the old design, I used to be able to look at someone's comment and see if anyone has replied to it. Does this feature not exist in the new design, or am I just blind ? ;)


That hasn't existed since v3. Now the default view is threaded.

RE[2]: On comment responses ...
by WorknMan on Wed 30th Jan 2008 19:10 UTC in reply to "RE: On comment responses ..."
WorknMan Member since:
2005-11-13

That hasn't existed since v3.


Yeah I know that ;) I just never bothered to comment on it until I saw this article about the new layout. I hope that feature comes back. As another poster said, it's just cool to be able to tell *at a glance* whether or not a particular comment has replies.

BTW: I noticed that when I go to 'comments' under My Account, that feature is there, so obviously the infrastructure for this already exists.

Edited 2008-01-30 19:11 UTC

Nice effort, but...
by gtada on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:50 UTC
gtada
Member since:
2005-10-12

Hey I applaud the effort, but there are some usability issues. The gray left-to-right gradients make text difficult to read. True it's most noticeable under the timestamp (not vital), but if you make that unreadable, why have that at all?

Whoa the timestamp went from black text to gray... that's fast service. ;)

Edited 2008-01-30 00:52 UTC

RE: Nice effort, but...
by brewin on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:56 UTC in reply to "Nice effort, but..."
brewin Member since:
2005-06-30

I just noticed the timestamps are always UTC even though I have it set to CST.

RE: Nice effort, but...
by sukru on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:08 UTC in reply to "Nice effort, but..."
sukru Member since:
2006-11-19

Hey I applaud the effort, but there are some usability issues. The gray left-to-right gradients make text difficult to read. True it's most noticeable under the timestamp (not vital), but if you make that unreadable, why have that at all?

Whoa the timestamp went from black text to gray... that's fast service. ;)


Please decrease the gradients, and push the user box a few pixels down.

Other than that, the new look is very nice. Good work!

Looks slick!
by rayiner on Wed 30th Jan 2008 00:54 UTC
rayiner
Member since:
2005-07-06

Great job. FWIW, I like the logo ;)

Comment by zizban
by zizban on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:02 UTC
zizban
Member since:
2005-07-06

This is really ugly.

New stories in a 2/3 column, below a huge banner with ads.

To right in a column are boxes, Lots of them. Distracting.

I am not a huge fan of this design. Take something simple and utterly butcher it. Yuck.

Doesn't display properly...
by chimby on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:10 UTC
chimby
Member since:
2006-10-02

Um...This top menu bar is wrapped on my WIDESCREEN monitor. Why do people design sites like this? I use FF; didn't anyone check this in FF before going to production? Sheesh.

Nope
by intangible on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:11 UTC
intangible
Member since:
2005-07-06

Nope, I don't like it... but it's not my site anyway ;) .

The contrast is too strong for me... maybe a light gray instead of white for the main background would help.

I don't come here for the design anyway, so whatever you guys like is fine. Even green on a magenta background wouldn't stop me from... Ok, maybe green on magenta would stop me ;) .

Advertisement area...
by Ben Jao Ming on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:22 UTC
Ben Jao Ming
Member since:
2005-07-26

...looks really stupid when you run an ad blocker.

RE: Advertisement area...
by miscz on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:42 UTC in reply to "Advertisement area..."
miscz Member since:
2005-07-17

You can add the ad background image to the filter list. There empty space looks better but I wish I could move "Logged in as..." box higher.

Anyway, I like the new look a lot. I miss "Lefty" theme though.

Very Nice
by thegrifman on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:24 UTC
thegrifman
Member since:
2006-10-13

I love the new look and what I especially like is that you didn't so drastically change the layout that I have to relearn everything. I hate when web sites do that!

I Like It!
by Jon Dough on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:32 UTC
Jon Dough
Member since:
2005-11-30

On balance, this is a good design. I like the look of the site, and the modularity of it. I like that I can change things to suit my taste. I like the way the new mechanism to mod comments works (the + & - disappear once you've made your mod).

Thanks, but no thanks.
by SEJeff on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:36 UTC
SEJeff
Member since:
2005-11-05

v4 made me kind of sick. It is too "web-2.0"-ish. I mainly only read OSNews through a feed reader now. It just seems too heavyweight and javascript filled.

This is a HUGE improvement over v4.0, but still isn't that great. Personal opinion only.

RE: Thanks, but no thanks.
by Adam S on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:51 UTC in reply to "Thanks, but no thanks."
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

Meh. When we were on v3, I got email every week from people complaining that moderation required another page load and that the site wasn't valid and that the site used weird HTML. Now we move to valid XHTML and Javascript and people complain.

You can't make everyone happy. We really do hate to lose you, I know you participated quite a bit, but alas... no matter what we do, there's always a vocal group who hates it. That's what happens when you have a website with lots of readers.

RE[2]: Thanks, but no thanks.
by zizban on Wed 30th Jan 2008 03:07 UTC in reply to "RE: Thanks, but no thanks."
zizban Member since:
2005-07-06

Nice attitude. I saw a lot of constructive criticism that maybe, maybe might improve your site.

RE[3]: Thanks, but no thanks.
by Adam S on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:35 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Thanks, but no thanks."
Adam S Member since:
2005-04-01

No attitude. I'm just telling you the facts.

RE[2]: Thanks, but no thanks.
by SEJeff on Wed 30th Jan 2008 05:33 UTC in reply to "RE: Thanks, but no thanks."
SEJeff Member since:
2005-11-05

Well remember when I emailed David and asked if the big "advertisement" showing the featured article could be removed since I was a subscriber? Your compromise was to set a cookie that removed it for 4 days if memory serves. Since v4 went live, that is not possible. In the dropdown where we can choose things, why can't you add a "blank" option? That is what drives me NUTS.

Thanks Adam, I know you truly care.

Nice
by koki on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:44 UTC
koki
Member since:
2005-10-17

I like this theme. The only problem that I see is the tight spacing of the top menu items; you may want to find a way to space them out a bit more.

Well, I don't like it...
by truckweb on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:45 UTC
truckweb
Member since:
2005-07-06

I'm using a 22" LCD, and the spacing of everything seems so tight in the middle of my screen it's ugly. And that white background is hard on the eyes.

Sorry to say, I liked more the old way.

Check out neowin.net or anandtech.com or some other site that are able to use all the space. The flow and presentation is just better.

RE: Well, I don't like it...
by Cass on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:48 UTC in reply to "Well, I don't like it..."
Cass Member since:
2006-03-17

Got to agree, the white is hard on the eyes !! The rest i dont mind though !

Stuff
by HappyGod on Wed 30th Jan 2008 01:56 UTC
HappyGod
Member since:
2005-10-19

Could you please bring back the 'Replies' link at the bottom of comments.

I liked being able to isolate a subset of comments away from the rest.

Also, please disable the 'post comment' link when a user is not logged on. I have now accidentally clicked this a couple of times when not logged on, typed a huge comment and then clicked submit. It informs you that you can't post anonymously, and wipes your comment. Very annoying.

Other than these gripes though, the site is definitely improved.

What a surprise
by bhhenry on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:03 UTC
bhhenry
Member since:
2005-07-06

I had finally got used to version 4.0. I guess I will get used to this, but first impression is I like the 4.0 look much better.

My only concrete criticism is the white background is too bright and is hard on the eyes, makes reading difficult to read. As has been the case for many versions, the text size is too small.

Great!!
by thebackwash on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:08 UTC
thebackwash
Member since:
2005-07-06

I love the new look. It is more generic (read less distinct and unique) than v3, but oh well, it looks really good.

Holy crap bad!
by sorpigal on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:09 UTC
sorpigal
Member since:
2005-11-02

When the last changed happened the only thing that kept me sane was the fact that I could switch to the not quite horrible classic theme. Now... this.

Quality had gone down anyway, but now I can't even read the damn thing.

Goodbye, osnews.

Good job
by Laurence on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:10 UTC
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

To be honest I hated v4.0 (though it didn't stop me from browsing) so I'm greatly pleased to see this update.

God job guys.

better
by Mellin on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:25 UTC
Mellin
Member since:
2005-07-06

better than that greenish theme

Congratulations!
by pureza on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:26 UTC
pureza
Member since:
2005-07-06

Congrats for the new theme. To be honest, I never liked the previous one and I kept using osnews classic until it was removed a few weeks ago.

Anyway, I have a single suggestion: would it be possible to disable the sidebar completely? If not, at least reduce its width.

Thanks!

Argh argh argh my feng shui
by 6c1452 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:44 UTC
6c1452
Member since:
2007-08-29

1: The extreme-left justification makes me want to violate Godwin's law. Make an option to put the sidebar on the left like normal people, or at least tab the left area in a little.

2: WTF fixed width. I use 1024x [strikethrough]at work[/strikethrough] sometimes (there is a good reason for this), and always have to resize my browser window to fit the page. This new version is much wider than 1024, making it now impossible to get rid of the bottom scroll bar.

3: The last version looked better, and the version before that was actually aesthetically pleasing.

4: The 'latest comic' thing is well-implemented, but the page it links to could use a forward/back browser.

5: Something that's bothering me for a while is that some things don't work the way one expects them to.

The first example of this is low-rated comments - they start shaded, and you can unroll them by clicking the titles. So clicking again should re-shade them -- which isn't really useful functionality, but makes sense. Instead, it takes you to (I think) a permalink page.

The second is, on a reply post, clicking the name of the post to which is is replying. It takes you to that post's permalink page, when one would expect it to take me to that post in the normal comment view. This is much faster when the posts are on the same page and allows you to continue browsing normally.

EDIT: This has been changed recently so that it now links to a page containing the conversation thread. This is better, but I perfer my way -- it would still allow one to navigate backward through a conversation, using the reply to links, and forward again with the forward button.

Basicly these are unrequested context switches (there is a usability term to describe this, but I don't know what it is), and are to be avoided. Permalinks should be accessed via a link that includes the work 'permalink'.

EDIT: 6: Yeah, the gray-on-white comment text is literally painful.

Edited 2008-01-30 02:56 UTC

This is a prank, right?
by Almafeta on Wed 30th Jan 2008 02:49 UTC
Almafeta
Member since:
2007-02-22

I mean, I used www4 for so long just because we were told it's how the site was going to be controlled; and now not even a month after being 'official', I have to go relearn positions for accessing all the controls?

And you're still using fixed-width columns? @_@ T_T

New look, hmmmm....
by ncc4100 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 03:15 UTC
ncc4100
Member since:
2006-05-10

Over all, the new look is ok. However, I have the following objections:

1. There is a big grey empty box at the top. It is distracting and look odd.
2. I think this is a theme issue, but the text is crowding the left had side of the browser. It really should have some sort of left hand margin.

The margin issue really bugs me. I can deal with the empty grey box, but I really would like to see perhaps a 1m or a 2m margin on the left hand side. Otherwise it looks pretty good.

RE: New look, hmmmm....
by David on Wed 30th Jan 2008 03:44 UTC in reply to "New look, hmmmm...."
David Member since:
2005-06-29

Big empty box? Are you using adblock? If so, that's your right, but we really shouldn't have to accommodate you in that case.

I try very hard to do non-intrusive and relevant advertising precisely so people won't be forced to adblock. I have adblock installed too, but I only enable it site by site to punish sites that attack me with aggressive ads.

RE[2]: New look, hmmmm....
by Nalle on Wed 30th Jan 2008 06:26 UTC in reply to "RE: New look, hmmmm...."
Nalle Member since:
2005-07-06

I use Adblock and and Filterset.G in Firefox and by default it blocks ads also on OSNews.

So when I for some reason reinstall Firefox from the ground up, like when I reinstalled my work-machine recently, Firefox will adblock ads also on OSNews. Then I turn it of, since the ads are not of the disturbing kind.

This morning I turned off adblock on OSNews as I used to, but I soon turned it on again. The OSNews staff have been quite clever in not showing ads that move around to much. I like that, since I hate those moving ads that draws attension from the things one wants to read.
Well, they don't anymore. Now there was an ad with a lightning and text that pop up, just to draw attension. Should not be there if you ask me.
I've been noticing the tendency for a while, but it's getting worse.

Ah, well, I've always got Adblock!

But it's a pitty really, isn't it?

Sorry for any bad spelling - I've just reinstalled and haven't had time to install English language pack for spell checking yet.

Nalle Berg
./nalle.

RE[3]: New look, hmmmm....
by 6c1452 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 07:43 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: New look, hmmmm...."
6c1452 Member since:
2007-08-29

Out of curiosity, do ads actually pay for views any more, or just clicks?

I don't mind ads as long as they're low-key - such as google ads - and/or well made, such as the MS SQL server ad I see in the right pane and an ad for a service called "Free Report" banner at top. Any sort of flash, animated GIF, etc. and I won't feel even slightly guilty about adblocking.

Of course, it helps a lot if you don't use flash and disable GIF animation - sites seem to detect your brower capabilities, and serve ads accordingly.

RE[4]: New look, hmmmm....
by David on Sun 3rd Feb 2008 20:33 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: New look, hmmmm...."
David Member since:
2005-06-29

All of the banner ads we run pay by the view. The google ads pay by the click.

RE[3]: New look, hmmmm....
by David on Sun 3rd Feb 2008 20:35 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: New look, hmmmm...."
David Member since:
2005-06-29

I don't allow ads that have flashing or vibrating images or anything like that, so if you ever see one, please let me know immediately, and I'll have it banned. I try really hard to respect the readers, so they won't feel the need to use Adblock.

RE[2]: New look, hmmmm....
by ncc4100 on Wed 30th Jan 2008 14:23 UTC in reply to "RE: New look, hmmmm...."
ncc4100 Member since:
2006-05-10

Yes I do use adblock. With adblock turned on, it isn't obvious that the space is used for ads. My apologies regarding the empty box.

Account info?
by i3X171UM on Wed 30th Jan 2008 03:46 UTC
i3X171UM
Member since:
2005-08-12

I can't for the life of me seem to find links to the various administration pages.

RE: Account info?
by i3X171UM on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:06 UTC in reply to "Account info?"
i3X171UM Member since:
2005-08-12

...seriously, what's going on? Where did user administration go?

RE[2]: Account info?
by Eugenia on Wed 30th Jan 2008 07:59 UTC in reply to "RE: Account info?"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

It's there. But you need Javascript enabled to see it, as it's now a popup window.

WHOA!
by jadeshade on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:02 UTC
jadeshade
Member since:
2007-07-10

you can't see the comments link! white-on-light-green is not the easiest to read, but the reverse is nearly invisible. Otherwise, this new design is quite pleasing.

project_2501
Member since:
2006-03-20

what was wrong with the original theme?

it was:
* clean
* very easy on the eye
* not confusing
* easy to navigate, logical structure
* sufficiently functional
* had no adverts in between posts and entries

Love it!
by jrronimo on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:22 UTC
jrronimo
Member since:
2006-02-28

I absolutely love the new theme. I didn't like the v4.0 version very much, but you're really turned that into something nice. I love everything about it... the matte colors... the color choices... It's really nice.

I would change only this: the stories that don't have a grey background, make them a different color from the page background. Otherwise the bar which is the separator (which I like, thanks for adding it) looks like it's just floating in space rather than acting as a bounds for the story.

Great design! Thanks for the hard work!

This is disgusting..
by BSDfan on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:29 UTC
BSDfan
Member since:
2007-03-14

What the f**k is this? It's ugly.. and why was the option of using the classic theme removed?

You're pissing us off OSNews adminstrators... cease and decist.

(Or post your complete mailing addresses...)

Comment by elsewhere
by elsewhere on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:33 UTC
elsewhere
Member since:
2005-07-13

I'm kind of torn, there are elements I like about this new look but it doesn't seem quite as clean as either the old look or the less-old look (v4). I can certainly live with it, and since I hit this site every day, I'm simply happy to have variety... ;)

However, two gripes that are purely subjective and stylistic.

a) Layout: The menu bar should not be wrapping, and the "Submit News", RSS, and top of the right-side layout boxes are all at varying heights. It just looks very frontpage-ish. Though I'm using Konqueror as my browser, so it could be I'm not rendering properly, though I'd be surprised. OSNews is one of the sites that seems to be the most accomodating for browsers be they desktop or mobile.

b) The "banner" bar at the top. The site is centered in the browser, which is nice and clean, but the gray "header" bar (for lack of a better word) containing the logo, menu bar etc. stretches across the width of the browser. It should be one way or the other. If you're going to center the page, then don't extend the banner across, it just doesn't look right, though that could also be a result of the contrast between the gray and the white. I seem to recall v4 had less of a contrast.

Anyways, I'll tip my hat and applaud the effort that went into redesigning the site. I know it's not an easy thing and you're certainly not going to please everyone.

Just offering my two pennies...

blech!
by abraxas on Wed 30th Jan 2008 04:40 UTC
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

Some good changes but some awful ones too. I hate having the bar on the right, is there any way to change it to the left side? The menubar (Home Originals, Conversations, etc.)at the top doesn't fit on one line in epiphany and using midori the login text boxes overlap with the element above. I do like the theme better than the last one though and the functional changes that have been made to the comment system since the switch from V3 have been excellent also.

Edited 2008-01-30 04:45 UTC

Nice job
by nswenson on Wed 30th Jan 2008 05:00 UTC
nswenson
Member since:
2007-03-23

The new look is great. I like it much better than the themes of yore.

Much improved
by tyrione on Wed 30th Jan 2008 05:38 UTC
tyrione
Member since:
2005-11-21

This comment about the right side wanting it back on the left is ergonomically retarded.

Having the right column be closest to the scrollbar makes sense.

Site is definitely much improved. You could work on a theme view where one can change the colors and perhaps the background colors between the two columns to offset them [make it easier for people contrast sensitive], but it's definitely an improved presentation.

Couple of comments...
by Bobthearch on Wed 30th Jan 2008 05:46 UTC
Bobthearch
Member since:
2006-01-27

I don't mind the overall theme, but have two suggestions:
1) The text in the main stories is hard to read. "Loyal OSNews readers, I'd like to thank you for your patience as we've made a bumpy transition to a new back-end and an even bumpier rollout..." I need glasses to read that on the main page. The problem is either the font color and the bright white background and/or the font size.

2) I liked the old logo better. ;)

Well ...
by Mikaku on Wed 30th Jan 2008 07:15 UTC
Mikaku
Member since:
2007-05-03

I really prefer the old style (3.0) the news were easier to read and, honestly the design was better for me. ;-P

This new design makes things floating around without some frame that help the eyes. It seems it's missing some CSS part.

As other guy asked:

"How do I get the old design back? There's no option in the preferences..."