posted by Laurence on Mon 21st Jul 2008 08:44
Conversations What's this currently set to and is it worth extending it (or possibly even removing it altogether?)

While I see the point in a time limit on news items, because a conversation doesn't have to be (and often isn't) bleeding edge news plus the fact that most people don't check conversations frequently, I don't really see the point in a time limit on conversation threads before they're closed off.
Previous ConversationNext Conversation
Comments:
Timeout
by Adam S (Staff) on Mon 21st Jul 2008 12:46 UTC
Adam S
Member since:
2005-04-01

I think the timeout is generous - 5 days after the LAST post. If a conversation is dead for 5 straight days, I doubt many are still checking it. I don't know, what do you think it should be?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Timeout
by Laurence (2.88) on Mon 21st Jul 2008 15:38 in reply to "Timeout"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

I think the timeout is generous - 5 days after the LAST post. If a conversation is dead for 5 straight days, I doubt many are still checking it. I don't know, what do you think it should be?



It's not 5 days after /last/ post because in my music thread theres a post on the 17th and I was unable to reply to another comment last night (the 20th).

Reply Score: 2

RE: Timeout
by RandomGuy (3.12) on Mon 21st Jul 2008 23:30 in reply to "Timeout"
RandomGuy Member since:
2006-07-30

How about some exponential decay?
Lets say a discussion is open while it has a score>9 where the score is calculated like this:
score=a0*exp(b0*(conv_start_time - current_time))
for c in comments: score+=a1*exp(b1*(c.time - current_time))
You could even factor things like user trust into a0, a1, b0, b1.

Alternatively, I'd suggest at least 7 days after last reply because some people have to work on Saturdays.
Anything longer than 14 days would be nuts, imo.

Reply Score: 2